Tuesday, December 16, 2008

The 3rd Way

I was going to write the following theory as a comment to Ramon’s Hezbollah post, but decided this was such a political and philosophical breakthrough that it deserved its own little space.

The left wing/right wing political scale is sadly inadequate. It's just 1 dimension after all. Perseus helps by creating the 'south wing' and also creating, by implication, a 'north wing'. Still, this doesn't go far enough. We're still only working with 2 dimensions here. Most of us live in a 3 dimensional world.

I therefore propose a political scale based on 3 dimensions: Left and Right (Width), North and South (Height), Front and Back (Depth).

The left and right indicates economic orientation. Strict, state-controlled socialism at one extreme and pure free market capitalism at the other.

On the north and south axis we have social orientation. We have a free or liberal society with values such as unlimited freedom of thought and speech to the south and social conservatism, with its old fashioned, Howard-like values to the north.

On the front and back or ‘depth’ axis, we have total, government-less anarchy at the front and dictatorship at the back.

We now have a much wider – if not somewhat more complex – range of labels to use. And we love labeling people don’t we? The names of these labels are yet to be determined, but, for example, if you were right, north and back (RNB), you’d be a pure fascist.

The book should be out for Christmas.

42 comments:

  1. What made you place Howard-like values at the North and the dictatorship styles at the back? Was it arbitrary or did you get a "feel"?

    So happy to come home from a Grade 6 graduation night and see this graphic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Melba, it was mainly just a 'feel'.

    Perseus had mentioned in a previous post that he was 'south wing' and I strongly suspect he doesn't hold Howard-like values. That was enough motivation for that one.

    No real logic to any of the designations really (except left and right which apparently dates back to which side of parliament you sat on during the French Revolution, i.e. anti or pro Monarch).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bob,
    There's a fatal flaw in your model. You need to intergrate a fourth dimension, Time.

    Emeritus Professor Peter Garrett has demonstrated that Time can cause the other three axiis to not only bend, but in many cases curve back on themselves, forming stable policy wormholes, the observable effect of which varies relative to the position of the observer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice, Mr E. Very nice.

    Trouble is, I don't know how to represent that graphically.

    Maybe in the interior of the cube there sits a bald head with a little clock in place of the brain, with curved arrows representing dynamic policy.

    Perhaps a penis protrudes from the forehead.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe just keep the box and pretend there's a cat inside?

    ReplyDelete
  6. and pretend there's a cat inside?

    Cats are natural anarchists, so that would skew the results.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Did I say Cat? Sorry I meant Pidgeon.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Peter fucking Garrett. I used to hate him, but now I think he's cool.

    He's exposed himself as the self- serving, opportunistic hypocrite that he has always been.

    One of my favourite sayings, and I made it up myself, is, "Never trust a rich socialist".

    ReplyDelete
  9. :) Mr E

    The box is lovely Lewd, don't listen to them

    ReplyDelete
  10. It is a lovely box, Bob.

    How long did it take you to make?

    ReplyDelete
  11. and pretend there's a cat inside?

    Is the cat dead or alive, or both? And which minister is responsible for killing or not killing the cat.

    ReplyDelete

  12. How long did it take you to make?


    Have you discussed pricing with Richard Pratt?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thank you Squib, Ramon.

    I created the box while watching Ocean's 11 for the eighth time. Consequently, it took 2 full ad breaks. The creation of the theory, however, took about 5 beers.

    Mr E, The Pratt is currently unavailable for comment and, therefore, nefarious deals are pending. Happy to be taken over however. My share price should soar just through such speculation.

    ReplyDelete
  14. if you were right, north and back (RNB), you’d be a pure fascist

    Bob, fascists end to be rahter keen on the government controlling everything - including the economy.

    On your box, a fascist would be more left(ish), north and back.

    But it's still a nice box.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes you're most likely right, that is, correct. It was an example and a poor one at that. This is why I haven't yet invented the labels.

    I suspect I'll have to invent fresh, previously unused labels. So perhaps RNB could be called, say, a Crumpet*.

    *This term is currently used for a form of highly processed breadstuff but is not yet in common political usage.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Fascist = Crumpet.

    Both should be well toasted, smeared in butter and eaten.

    I like the way you think, Bob.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Given the numerous scales one could apply to political thought, shouldn't that be some sort of n-dimensional hypercube, Bob?

    I'd like to see you whip one of those up during ad breaks in MacGuyver.

    ReplyDelete
  18. As it happens Boogey, I specialised in n-dimensional hypercubes at the University of Superfluousness. They're pretty hard to draw. I'd need a whole Police Academy franchise worth of ad breaks for that one.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Cricket's just started, Bob.

    Maybe you could knock up a couple of n-dimensional hypercubes between overs.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jesus Christ. I just completed the hypercube and then was forced to throw it at the telly in a rage. Hayden, get fucked, you born again twat. Ponting, get fucked, you little bogan. Hussey, get fucked, you boring tit.

    ReplyDelete
  21. You thieving cunt, Bob.

    I'm sure I showed you my 'compass' years ago.

    Left and right were east and west.

    The more north you are the more reactionary you are.

    I positioned myself South-West with my fellow chardonnay socialists. Hitler would be North East.

    Admittedly, my compass was one dimensional. You've improved the theory with a box form.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes, but you didn't do it as a cool box, Pers.

    ReplyDelete
  23. He possibly didn't do it at all. I don't remember any ridiculous compass. He's off his rocker. I'm calling for an enquiry.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I'm calling for an enquiry

    Take it up with Bob Brown, Bob, he's fond of inquiring into things.

    OMGOMGOMG - it's all just slotted into place.

    Lewd Bob IS Bob Brown.

    ReplyDelete
  25. No comment. Other than this: if I see you standing next to me in that t-shirt Ramon, I'll punch you in the head.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I thought the Greens were into non-violent direct action?

    ReplyDelete

  27. Lewd Bob IS Bob Brown.


    According the "rules" of Quantum Superposition, Bob can be Bob Brown while at the same time not be Bob Brown, as long as nobody opens the box.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I'm sure I showed you my 'compass' years ago.

    I used to play that game too, but it was with the neighbourhood girls, I was only 8 at the time, and I'm pretty sure we never called it a 'compass'.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Let me assure you of 2 things:

    1. I may or may not be Bob Brown.

    2. I have never seen Perseus's compass in any guise.

    ReplyDelete
  30. You can't be Bob Brown Lewd.

    You have a demonstrated a clear abilty to think in three dimensions and recognise various political and socio-economic perspectives.

    Bob Brown is a useless one-dimensional fuckwit who three Tasmanians (Sorry EMS, but I hope you aren't one of them) voted for.

    And I quite like the box.

    ReplyDelete
  31. The box seems to have taken on a life of its own. Before I know it, it will be dating other boxes, spheres or even pyramids. But I WON'T let it date a cylinder, by god I won't!

    ReplyDelete
  32. "Can it date a cone?"

    Can it even pull a cone?

    ReplyDelete
  33. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  34. But I WON'T let it date a cylinder, by god I won't!

    Shape-ist Cunt!

    Tyler Cassidy held similar views, and where did he end up?

    In a Box!

    ReplyDelete
  35. If there are 2 things I hate, it's intolerance for other shapes, and cyclinders.

    ReplyDelete
  36. You say that Bob, yet your avitar shows you with a cylindrical object in your mouth.

    To paraphrase the Bard, "Methinks the Lewdy protests too much!"

    ReplyDelete
  37. You're right. My ex-wife was a cylinder. There, I've said it.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I was dating a moebius strip for a while, but the relationship never seem to go anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  39. I knew I'd seen that box before somewhere.

    It was at Kevin07's victory bash last year.

    It was trying to pick up a couple of pissed Goth boxes.

    ReplyDelete
  40. are you saying you ate your ex-wife??

    I was not going there, but what the hell. Somebody has to.

    Perhaps if he did she might not be his ex.

    Just sayin'

    ReplyDelete
  41. That's a very tenuous link. Anyway, I haven't even been charged.

    ReplyDelete